Skip to main content
Book a Strategy Session
left arrow in circle outlineBack To Home

Marketing for Recruitment Agencies

sagar sethi
Sagar Sethi
September 28, 2026

Recruitment agencies run the most confusing website brief in the service economy. The same site has to convince an employer to trust you with a critical hire and convince a candidate that you are worth speaking to, and those two people want almost opposite things from the first paragraph.

I have spent 13 years working on organic search for service businesses, and the agencies that grow predictably are the ones that stopped trying to serve both audiences with one capability statement. They built separate paths, then filled them with specific pages.

This is written for the owner or director of an Australian recruitment or staffing agency who wants to know where the effort should go when hiring slows and every enquiry has to count. It stays out of broad B2B strategy, account based marketing and the job board end of the business.

Employers and candidates search differently

Two audiences, one website

An employer searches with a role and a problem: a financial controller in Western Sydney, a site supervisor for a project starting in six weeks, someone who can start immediately. A candidate searches with a job title and a place, and increasingly with a question about what an agency is like to deal with.

The candidate side of that market is measurable. Per ABS labour force figures, "In August 2026, the unemployment rate increased to 4.6% in seasonally adjusted terms, with the number of unemployed people increasing by 28,200 to 722,900 people." That is a lot of people using the same search results your candidate pages sit in.

Both audiences land on your homepage. Almost none of them get what they need there, because a homepage can only make one first impression.

What each one is trying to solve

The employer is trying to reduce risk. Will this agency understand the role, bring credible people quickly, and represent the business properly to candidates. The candidate is trying to reduce uncertainty. Do you actually place the roles they want, in the places they live, and what happens once they send a CV.

Different risks, different questions, different pages. The rest of this piece is about building those pages so each audience finds its own answer without having to dig through the other audience's content.

Why one capability statement satisfies nobody

The employer's first question

An employer's first question is almost always about the sector and the role type. Have you placed this kind of person before, and do you understand what the job involves. A general statement about your values and your network does not answer it, and neither does a list of twenty industries.

What answers it is a page that names the sector, names the roles you actually fill, and shows that you know how that market hires. The more specific the page, the more qualified the enquiry that follows.

The candidate's first question

A candidate's first question is whether there is anything in it for them. Which roles you place, in which locations, how you treat people who apply, and whether you will still be useful in six months if this role is not right.

Where those questions go unanswered, candidates send their CV to whoever made it easiest. They are not being disloyal. They are being efficient, and your site gave them no reason to slow down.

The pages a recruitment agency needs

Sector pages, role pages, process page

Three page types do most of the work. Sector pages, one for each industry where you genuinely place most of your work. Role pages, one for each role type you fill regularly. And a process page that explains how you work with an employer from brief to shortlist, and how you work with a candidate from application to placement.

Add a page for each location you genuinely recruit in, if you can put something real on it. Where you cannot, it is better to leave it out than to publish a page that repeats the same paragraph with a suburb changed.

What each page has to prove

A sector page has to prove you know that industry's hiring market. A role page has to prove you understand the job itself, including the qualification or experience that makes someone credible in it. A process page has to prove you are organised, with realistic timeframes and named points of contact.

Proof is specific or it is noise. Two strong sector pages, each with real detail, will outperform ten pages that all say the same thing about your network.

Building sector and role pages that rank

Specific beats general

Search demand for agency services is usually specific to a sector and a role, which is convenient, because it means the same specificity that helps an employer also helps you get found. A page about placing accountants in mid tier firms competes with far less noise than a page about recruitment services.

Pick the two or three sectors where you genuinely win most of your work, and write those pages properly before adding any others. If a sector brings you one placement a year, a page for it is maintenance with no return.

Writing for a role, not a keyword

Write the page for the person hiring, and describe the role the way they describe it. What the job involves, what a strong candidate looks like, what usually goes wrong in hiring for it, and how you screen for it. That content is useful, and usefulness is what earns the ranking.

Where a page needs the sector and role pages developed as a set, that is the work behind sector and role page content that earns enquiries.

Showing proof without overclaiming

Placements, time to shortlist, specialisms

Employers want the same proof on a website that they want on a first call. The sectors you place in. The roles you fill. How long a shortlist usually takes. How you screen, and what a client is expected to do. Where you can evidence a number, publish it, and say what period it covers.

Numbers you cannot stand behind do more damage than an absence of numbers, because the first client who checks will find out. An agency with no published statistics and a clear process reads as more credible than one with impressive figures and no explanation.

What employers ask for

The questions I hear from employers on agency sites are about coverage and reliability. Do you work on retained or contingent terms, what happens if the first shortlist misses, how you handle a candidate withdrawing, and who is accountable when something goes wrong.

Answer those on the page and you have answered the objection that usually stops a first call. Where you would rather have a case in front of a client, the work I have done with professional services firms shows how that proof is usually presented.

Reading the labour market before you write

What the official figures do and do not say

Published labour market figures are useful context for a page, and they are dangerous when they are used to sound informed. The current vacancy picture comes from ABS job vacancies figures: "Total job vacancies were 329,500, a decrease of 2.1% from February 2026."

The same release also settles an argument that comes up regularly in agency marketing. Per the ABS job vacancies release, "Job vacancies is a count of every position advertised within a single notice, while some job advertisements may be used to fill multiple positions." Ad volumes are not a market size, and a page claiming otherwise is easy to disprove.

Using numbers honestly on a page

Use a figure where it explains something true about your service. A tight market for a particular role is a reason to explain how quickly you can bring candidates to shortlist. A softer market is a reason to explain how you screen for people who will stay.

The same discipline applies to your own workforce story. Per Jobs and Skills Australia's occupation profile for recruitment consultants, the employed figure for the occupation is 33,000, drawn from the 2021 Census of Population and Housing, with a 69 per cent female share of employment and a median age of 36. Those are facts about the industry you work in, and they support a point. They are not a sales argument on their own.

Where paid search fits alongside organic

Role level demand and budget discipline

Paid search works best for role level demand where a client needs someone now, and where the search has enough urgency to justify the click. A tight budget spread across every sector you serve will not produce anything measurable, and it teaches you nothing about which sectors convert.

Pick two or three sectors, match the landing page to the role, and hold the spend long enough to see whether the enquiries are the right ones. If a campaign produces briefs you never win, the problem is usually the page rather than the bid.

When it is the wrong first move

Paid search is the wrong first move when the pages behind it do not answer the employer's questions, and when you are paying for searches you already win organically. It is also the wrong move for a sector you have decided not to grow, however good the search demand looks.

Fix the pages first, then use paid search to fill genuine gaps. Agencies that run it the other way around end up paying for attention they then have to convert on a website that does not help them.

Measuring quality of enquiries

Tracking by page and by sector

Track which page produced each enquiry and which sector it came from. That single change tells you which sector pages justify more content and which ones attract enquiries you never convert. If a sector page produces briefs outside your specialism, that is a content problem, and content problems are cheaper to fix than traffic problems.

Review it monthly and in the same format every time. A short table that shows enquiries by page and by sector will tell you more than a channel level report that hides where the work actually came from.

The numbers that predict revenue

Track enquiries, qualified conversations, roles taken on and placements made. Those four numbers, reviewed by sector, predict revenue far better than sessions or rankings, because they connect the marketing to the part of the business that pays for it.

Where that measurement needs setting up properly, it is what measuring what marketing actually returns covers. If you would rather take the whole picture in at once, from your sector pages to your enquiry sources, marketing help for B2B service businesses is the starting point I usually recommend.

Frequently asked questions

Should our website speak to employers or candidates first?

Both need a path, but they need different paths. Employers care about specialism, speed to shortlist and how you screen. Candidates care about the roles you actually place, the sectors you know and what happens after they apply. Give each audience its own route from the homepage rather than a single blended statement.

Are sector pages worth building if we place across many industries?

Yes, for the sectors where you genuinely win most of your work. A page for a sector you place in once a year is content maintenance with no return. Two strong sector pages beat ten thin ones, and search demand for agency services is usually specific to a sector and a role.

What proof should we publish?

The things an employer would ask on a first call: the sectors you place in, typical roles, how long a shortlist takes, and how you screen. Publish facts you can stand behind. Numbers that cannot be evidenced do more damage than an absence of numbers.

Is paid search worth running alongside organic?

It can be, particularly for role level demand where a client needs someone now. The trap is paying for searches you already win organically or spreading a small budget across every sector. Decide which two or three sectors justify the spend before switching anything on.

How do we know whether our enquiries are the right ones?

Track which page produced each enquiry and which sector it came from. If a sector page produces briefs you never win, the page is attracting the wrong brief. That is a content problem, and it is cheaper to fix than a traffic problem.

Do we need to publish the labour market numbers on our website?

Only where they support something true about your service. Citing a market figure to look informed is not the same as using it to explain why a sector is hard to hire in and what you do about it. The ABS figures quoted above are context, not a sales argument.

Are you doing SEO or Ads?

Get a free consultation with us

Stop wasting money on ads that are not working.

Get advertising that is intentional and measured properly.

  • Reach your ideal target audience.
  • Maximise ad spend efficiency.
free digital marketing consultation

Get in touch with us!

Contact UsContact UsDigital marketing logo light variant
scale your business with sagar sethi

Looking to scale your business?

I offer digital marketing consulting, web design and development services.
Learn MoreDigital marketing logo light variant
Sagar Sethi

About Sagar Sethi

I came to Australia in 2006 with $500 to my name and a dream to make it big. No job was big or small as long as I stuck to my values and it got closer to my goals. Today I run a successful digital marketing agency. 


It has always operated with a 'Human First' approach. Our values keep us square and keep the fluff out. We have worked with some of the biggest names in Australian business. 

Latest Blog

View All Blogs

Awards & Certifications

Xugar's curved branding element, representing innovative marketing consulting

WINNER

Web Excellence
Awards
2024
Xugar's curved branding element, representing innovative marketing consulting

FINALIST

Australian Small Business Champion Awards
2024
Xugar's curved branding element, representing innovative marketing consulting

FINALIST

Business xCellence Awards
2024
Xugar's curved branding element, representing innovative marketing consulting

WINNER

Local Business
Awards
2024

Book a free 30-minute Strategy Session

Tell me a bit about your business and we can dial in a strategy that fits.

    sagar sethi
    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram

    Xugar Holiday Offer