Are you doing SEO or Ads?
Get a free consultation with us
Stop wasting money on ads that are not working.
- Get advertising that is intentional and measured properly.
- Reach your ideal target audience.
- Maximise ad spend efficiency.

Most business owners who ask me about a marketing audit do not have a marketing problem. They have a visibility problem. Money leaves the account every month and nobody in the business can say which part of it brought a customer through the door. I have run marketing audits for Australian businesses for thirteen years, and the first conversation rarely changes. The owner can describe everything they are paying for. They cannot describe what it returns. That gap is the whole reason an audit exists. A marketing audit is an evidence-based review of everything your business spends on marketing and publishes, measured against what the business is actually trying to achieve. It is a diagnostic, not a redesign, and it is not a sales document for a new website. A marketing audit is a structured review of your marketing spend, channels, tracking and published content, judged against the business result you are paying for. Sit with that sentence for a moment, because it sets the boundary. The deliverable is not an opinion about your logo. It is a documented answer to three questions: what is working, what is not, and what should be fixed first. A website review looks at whether the site is fast, readable and technically sound. An SEO report looks at rankings, indexing and search visibility. A marketing audit looks at the whole commercial picture, including the parts that never touch your website, such as what you pay a media buyer, what your email list is doing and whether your enquiry reporting is telling you the truth. It is also not a proposal in disguise. If the first thing a provider does is recommend a rebuild before they have looked at your data, you are being sold to rather than audited. Audit sounds like an investigation. Owners hear it and assume someone is about to tell them they have been doing it wrong for years, which is rarely the case. Most businesses I look at have a sensible strategy and a broken feedback loop. They are not foolish, they are flying without instruments. I use the word anyway, because the alternatives are worse. A review sounds optional. A health check sounds like a subscription. An audit is what it is: a structured look at evidence. This is where every audit starts, because everything downstream depends on it. I check whether conversion tracking fires once per enquiry, whether the numbers reconcile with what the business actually received, and whether anyone would notice if tracking stopped tomorrow. If tracking is wrong, every optimisation decision after it is noise. Fixing measurement is unglamorous and it is almost always the highest value work in the whole engagement. Every channel gets the same treatment: what it cost, what it produced, and what one result cost you. That last number is the one owners rarely have. Marketing teams tend to report reach, impressions and engagement because those numbers are available and they always look like progress. The wider industry runs on the same habit. As HubSpot's marketing statistics report puts it, "Conversion Rate Optimisation is the second-most-used optimisation technique among marketers (50%)." Being the second most used technique is not the same as being used well, and the audit is where the difference shows up. The technical health of the site matters commercially, because Google publishes thresholds and visitors behave accordingly. As web.dev explains, "To provide a good user experience, LCP should occur within 2.5 seconds of when the page first starts loading." The same source sets the other two: "To provide a good user experience, pages should have a INP of 200 milliseconds or less." and "To provide a good user experience, pages should maintain a CLS of 0.1." Those three numbers are useful because they are testable. I would rather hand an owner three thresholds they can check than a paragraph about the site feeling sluggish. If you want to work through this part yourself before you spend money on traffic, the technical SEO checklist is the free starting point I hand people. Then I look at what the business is actually visible for. Not the keywords the owner hoped to rank for, the queries that bring people in. That means reviewing published content against the thing Google is explicit about. As Google Search Central states, "People-first content means content that's created primarily for people, and not to manipulate search engine rankings." Content that exists to fill a keyword gap rather than answer a question tends to sit there earning nothing. An audit identifies which pages do commercial work and which are decoration. Finally, the money. What is fixed, what is variable, what is locked into a contract, and what would stop immediately if it proved to be useless. Most businesses have at least one line item that has been renewed twelve times without a single conversation about whether it worked. If someone asks what a lead costs you and the answer takes more than a minute, you need an audit. This is the clearest single signal, because it means no channel can be judged against any other. When your dashboard says forty enquiries and your inbox has twelve, one of those numbers is lying, and it matters enormously which one. Reconciling reported conversions against real enquiries is one of the first things I do. Inherited accounts are the most common situation I see. The person who built the campaigns has left, the logins are shared with someone who no longer works there, and nobody knows why a particular audience is excluded. Nothing is broken enough to notice and nothing is documented enough to trust. If you spent more this quarter than last quarter and got fewer enquiries, something is absorbing the difference. It is usually a match type, a location setting or a landing page that degraded quietly. Platforms change defaults, retire metrics and rename events. Each change is survivable on its own. Three changes in a year and your year on year comparison is meaningless, which is exactly when owners make their worst decisions. The move from Universal Analytics to Google Analytics 4 was the largest single break in measurement this decade, and a lot of businesses never fully recovered their history. As Google Analytics Help states, "Starting the week of July 1, 2024: You will not have access to any current or historical Universal Analytics data and most users will lose access to the interface and the API on this date." Plenty of owners noticed the new interface and assumed the data moved with it. It did not. Any year on year comparison built across that boundary is comparing two different systems. Two tracking tags on one thank you page is the most common fault I find. It doubles the reported conversion count, which makes a channel look twice as expensive as it is and hides the campaigns that are actually working. Consent banners change what gets recorded. That is correct behaviour and it is not a bug, but it means your reported numbers are a floor rather than a total. If you do not know roughly how much is being suppressed, you will misread a smaller, more honest number as a decline in performance. A website audit stops at the site. It will tell you your pages are slow, your headings are inconsistent and your internal links are thin. It will not tell you whether any of that is costing you money. An SEO audit stops at search. It covers technical health, indexation, content quality and backlinks. It will not look at your paid media, your email list or your budget split. A marketing audit is the one that connects the site, the channels, the spend and the measurement into a single picture. If search traffic is falling and you do not know why, that is an SEO audit. If the site converts badly for the traffic it already gets, that is a website audit. If you cannot say whether your marketing returns more than it costs, you need a marketing audit, and the other two may become follow on pieces of work afterward. A score out of one hundred is a sales device. It tells you nothing you can act on and it is impossible to argue with. What you want is a findings document: each finding, the evidence behind it, what it costs you, and what to do about it. Every action should carry who owns it and roughly how much effort it takes. A list of twenty improvements with no owner and no order is the same as no list at all, because nothing on it will get done. You should finish an audit with fewer numbers than you started with, and a clear routine for checking them. If you cannot check your own marketing in ten minutes a month, the reporting is too complicated to survive a busy quarter. Ask what is in scope and, more importantly, what is not. Ask what access the auditor needs. If someone claims they can audit your conversion tracking without account access, they are describing a guess rather than an audit. On the measurement side, the work is genuinely closer to fixing your Google Analytics setup than to reading a monthly report. Ask who is doing the analysis and whether they will tell you what they are not qualified to assess. An honest auditor names the edge of their competence. Someone who is expert in everything is expert in nothing. Three things should make you pause. A fixed finding count promised before any research. A price quoted without a question about your margins. A proposal that cannot describe what the finished document looks like. Any of the three means you are buying a template. The most common DIY error is starting with the ad accounts. It is the most interesting part and the least reliable, because you are judging channels against numbers that may be wrong. Confirm the measurement before you optimise anything. If you change the landing page, the headline, the match type and the budget in the same week, you have learned nothing about any of them. Change one thing, let it run, then decide. One month is a sample, not a verdict. Seasonal swings, a slow fortnight and a competitor's campaign can all move a single month. Judge on a quarter where you can. Fix tracking, then fix the things that waste the most money, then reallocate budget. Doing it in that order means every later decision is made on reliable numbers. Doing it out of order means you are optimising a broken signal. Write the current numbers down before you touch a thing. Without a baseline you cannot tell a real improvement from a seasonal one, and you have no way to defend the spend. Knowing what each channel genuinely returns is the core of measuring the return on each channel, and it is also how you decide where the next dollar goes. Are you doing SEO or Ads? Stop wasting money on ads that are not working. It is a structured review of everything your business spends on marketing and everything it publishes, measured against what the business is trying to achieve. You get a list of what is working, what is not, and what to fix first. It is a diagnostic, not a redesign. Once a year as a baseline, and again whenever something changes your data: a new website, a platform change, a staffing change, or a quarter where spend went up and enquiries did not. Tracking problems are the fastest thing to detect and the slowest to notice, so an annual check is a reasonable minimum. It depends on scope. A single-channel audit (Google Ads only, for example) is a much smaller piece of work than a whole-of-marketing review across search, paid, email, content and measurement. The honest answer is that access is the bottleneck: if I cannot get into your ad accounts and analytics, the audit is guesswork. Often yes, and it is not an accusation. An independent audit checks whether the plan matches the business goals and whether the tracking actually proves it. Plenty of good agencies deliver good work against a brief that no longer fits the business. I will not quote a number here, because scope drives cost and quoting blind would be dishonest. Ask any provider what is in scope, what is explicitly out of scope, how many hours are involved and what you receive at the end. Judge the proposal on that, not on the headline price. You can, and you should do a light version every quarter. Focus on three things: is conversion tracking recording real enquiries, which channels produced them, and what did each one cost. The harder parts, like separating brand demand from paid demand or spotting cannibalisation, usually need an outside eye. You do not need anyone's permission to check your own marketing. You need four answers. What did each channel cost last quarter? What did each one return? Can you prove it from the account rather than from a report? And if you cannot prove it, what would you need to see before you decide? Most of the value in an audit sits in the reconciliation, not the recommendations. That is where the surprises are, and it is usually where the money is. You can see how I scope this work on marketing audit services. If you cannot tell which half of your marketing is working, send me the accounts you can share access to and I will tell you where I would look first. Reach me through the contact page and I will tell you honestly whether a full audit is the right piece of work or whether a smaller fix would do.
What Is a Marketing Audit?
The plain definition in one sentence
What it is not: a website review, an SEO report or a sales document
Why the word audit puts people off
What a Marketing Audit Actually Examines
Measurement and tracking health
Channel performance by cost and return
Website, landing pages and conversion path
Search and content visibility
Budget allocation and commitments
Five Signs You Need an Audit Now
You cannot state your cost per enquiry
Reporting tools disagree with your bank account
You inherited campaigns you did not set up
Growth has stalled while spend increased
A platform change broke your reporting
Why Tracking Breaks Without Anyone Noticing
The Google Analytics 4 transition and what was lost
Duplicated and missing conversion events
Consent mode and under-reported conversions
Marketing Audit vs a Website or SEO Audit
Where each one stops
How to tell which one you actually need
What You Should Receive at the End
A findings document, not a score out of 100
Prioritised actions with owners and effort
A measurement plan you can check monthly
How to Judge an Audit Before You Buy One
Scope, access and evidence
Who does the work and what they will not cover
Red flags in audit proposals
Common Mistakes in DIY Audits
Auditing channels and ignoring tracking
Changing four things at once
Judging a channel on one month of data
Turning Findings Into a Plan
Sequence the fixes: measurement first, then spend
Set a baseline before you change anything
Get a free consultation with us

Marketing Audit FAQ
What is a marketing audit in simple terms?
How often should an Australian small business run one?
How long does a marketing audit take?
Do I need an audit if I am already working with an agency?
What should a marketing audit cost?
Can I audit my own marketing?




Latest Blog

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER

Xugar Holiday Offer