Are you doing SEO or Ads?
Get a free consultation with us!
Stop wasting money and unlock the hidden potential of your advertising.
- Discover the power of intentional advertising
- Reach your ideal target audience.
- Maximise ad spend efficiency.

Everybody repeats the same line about long tail keywords, that they are easier to rank for, and then they go and do the thing that ruins it. They write a separate thin page for every phrase they can find, and a year later the site has sixty pages nobody links to and nobody reads. The advice is right and the execution is usually wrong. Thirteen years in, the pattern I see most often is a business chasing the tail one phrase at a time instead of grouping the tail into fewer, better pages. Here is how to find the queries, how to judge them, and how to write something that actually holds its position. Ahrefs puts it more precisely than most: "Long-tail keywords are search queries that get a small number of searches per month. They tend to be longer and more specific than their "head" or short-tail counterparts and, therefore, often have a higher conversion rate." The defining feature is specificity, not word count. Emergency plumber Carlton is long tail. Plumber is not. Someone searching the first one has told you their problem, their suburb and their urgency, and they are looking for a phone number rather than a brochure. Head terms are the short, high-volume phrases everyone in your industry fights over. They are expensive, slow, and often produce enquiries that were never going to convert because the searcher had no idea what they wanted. Tail terms are the opposite in every respect: lower volume individually, easier to rank for, and far more likely to come from someone who has already decided what they need. Ahrefs is direct about the competitive difference: "Reason 1. Long-tail keywords are (generally) a lot less competitive". This is the part that changes how you plan. The distribution of search volume is not a bell curve, it is a cliff with a very long floor. Ahrefs states: "94.74% of keywords get 10 monthly searches or fewer. (Ahrefs)" and separately: "0.0008% of keywords get more than 100,000 monthly searches. (Ahrefs)" Add those two numbers up and the strategy writes itself. Almost every keyword in existence is a tail keyword. The pages competing for the tiny handful of head terms are fighting over a slice of the market that is smaller than it looks. There is a second reason the tail rewards patience. Ahrefs also reports: "The top-ranking page gets the most total search traffic only 49% of the time. (Ahrefs)" Rank one does not guarantee you the traffic, which means the value of a page comes from covering a query properly rather than from beating one competitor on one phrase. And the pool keeps refilling. The same Ahrefs collection states: "15% of all Google searches have never been searched before. (Google)" Every one of those brand new queries is, by definition, a specific phrase rather than a head term, which is why the tail is not a fixed list you can finish working through. Ten searches a month sounds like nothing, and that is the argument used to dismiss the tail. Now count it properly. Ten searches a month is a hundred and twenty a year, from people describing exactly the job you do, in exactly the suburb you do it. Multiply that across forty tail queries that share the same intent and you have a page earning real enquiries. The other thing about low volume is that it is a lagging indicator. Ahrefs describes a newer category of tail query worth knowing about: "Conversational long-tail keywords are the queries people search on AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google's AI Mode." Those queries rarely show up in a volume tool at all, and they are where a growing share of buying questions are now being asked. Type the beginning of a question into Google and read the autocomplete list. Every entry is a phrase real people completed. Then scroll to the bottom and read the related searches. Then open People also ask and click two of the questions, which generates more of them. Do that around five different openings relevant to your service and you will have sixty to eighty candidate phrases in twenty minutes, for free, from Google itself. Ten per cent of them will be worth writing about. This is the highest value step and the one most businesses skip. Open the Queries report in Search Console and filter positions to something like eight to thirty. Every query in that list is one Google already considers you relevant for, with real impressions, where you are not yet earning the click. Those are not guesses. They are confirmed demand that your site is already close to winning. Sort by impressions and take the top twenty. If you have never worked this report, the walkthrough in how to do keyword research covers it step by step. Look at what your competitors rank for that you do not. You do not need a paid tool for this, you can work through their sitemap and check the questions their pages answer. If you do have a tool, use it to find phrases they rank for where the page competing is thin, because that is where an opportunity still exists. Be careful with tools here. They estimate volume, and the tail is precisely where estimates are least reliable. A phrase showing zero volume in a tool can still be worth a page if the intent is commercial and the query is real. Ask what happens after the reader finishes. If the honest answer is nothing you would want, the query is not worth a page regardless of how easy it looks. A phrase a business owner searches for research is worth less to you than a phrase their customer searches when they need the job done. Look at the top three results. If they are thin pages from small local businesses, it is an opportunity. If they are national publishers, government sites or a forum thread, the query is broader than it looks and probably needs a different angle. Look at whether the ranking pages actually answer the query. In the tail, a surprising number do not. A page that ranks for a question and then never answers it is a gap you can walk into with a properly structured page. Before writing anything, search your own domain for the query. If a service page, a category page or an older post already targets it, a new page splits your authority between two URLs and both drop. This is where tail strategies go wrong most often. The fix is not another page, it is a section added to the page that already ranks, or a merge of two weak pages into one strong one. A question about cost wants a page that leads with a figure or a range and then explains what moves it. A comparison question wants a page structured around the criteria. A how to question wants steps in order. A local query wants the location, the service area and proof you actually work there. Getting this right is most of the work. The tail is unforgiving about format because the searcher has been specific, and a page that does not match that specificity gets read and abandoned. State the answer in the first two sentences, then explain. Someone arriving from a specific search is checking whether you have what they need, and they will judge that in seconds. If the answer is four hundred words down, they will go back and click the next result instead. Write the important section so it stands alone. That means a descriptive heading, then a complete answer in one or two self contained sentences, then the detail. This is exactly the shape that both featured snippets and AI generated answers pull from, and it happens to be easier to read as well. Do not distort the page for it. If a question is genuinely a list of steps, use a numbered list. If it is genuinely a definition, define it in a sentence and move on. Are you doing SEO or Ads? Stop wasting money and unlock the hidden potential of your advertising. Group the phrases that share an intent and write one page that covers the group properly. Ten related questions about the same job belong on one page, not on ten pages competing with each other for the same reader. The test is simple. If two phrases would produce the same reader wanting the same answer, they belong together. If they would produce readers wanting genuinely different things, they are separate topics. Build a new page when the intent is different, when the topic is substantial enough to deserve its own treatment, or when the grouping has become genuinely mixed. A good sign that you need a new page is that you can write a distinctive heading for it that is not just a rephrasing of one you already have. What does not warrant a page is a slight variation in wording. That is how sites end up with dozens of pages nothing links to. A page with no internal links is a page Google has to find on its own, and it usually finds it late. Build a hub page that covers the broad topic and link out to each of the deeper pages with anchor text that says what they are about. Descriptive anchors matter more in the tail than anywhere else, because the anchor is often the only signal a search engine has about what a new page covers before it has any links from anywhere. Your service pages already earn authority. Add a short section linking to the deeper questions you have answered, and you pass some of that strength down. This also helps the reader, because someone on a service page often has exactly the question those pages answer. Keep the anchors natural and specific rather than repetitive. The same exact anchor text repeated across every page looks mechanical and helps less. If the technical side of this is unfamiliar, a technical SEO checklist will walk you through the parts that must be right before any of the rest matters. Individual tail queries move around too much to track meaningfully. Group the phrases that belong to one page and watch the group. If the group's combined impressions and clicks climb over a quarter, the page is working even when no single query looks impressive. Impressions move first. That is the normal sequence, and it is why new pages look dead in the first month. A page gaining impressions is being indexed and evaluated for the right queries, which is the signal you need early. Clicks follow as the page settles and the title and description earn the tap. If impressions climb and clicks do not, the problem is usually the title, the meta description or the position rather than the content. If impressions never appear at all, the query was wrong or the page is lost without internal links. A full SEO audit is the efficient way to find out which of those you have. Answer engines are built on retrieval, and retrieval works best against specific, well defined passages. A page that answers one narrow question completely is far easier to use as a source than a broad page that skims forty topics. This is the tail's natural advantage expressed in a newer format. The specific question is exactly what these systems are asked, and the page that answers it clearly is the one worth pulling from. Write the definition, the steps or the comparison so each stands on its own without the surrounding page. Name the thing you are talking about rather than referring to it as this or it. Attribute nothing you cannot source, and keep the factual statements specific enough to be useful to someone who only reads that one paragraph. If visibility in AI answers is a priority for your site, that is the discipline behind AI search visibility work, and it starts with the same specific answers the tail rewards. The first is writing one page per phrase, which creates a set of near identical pages that compete with each other. The second is chasing volume estimates in a tool and skipping queries that show zero, when zero usually means the tool has not measured it rather than that nobody searches it. The third is ignoring the queries you already rank for. Search Console is full of confirmed demand the site is close to winning, and it is free. The fourth is publishing tail pages with no internal links and then concluding that tail keywords do not work, when the real problem was that nothing pointed at the page. And the fifth is expecting speed. Tail traffic compounds. A page that starts earning impressions in week three and clicks in month three is working exactly as it should, and the businesses that win the tail are the ones still publishing in month nine. Start this week with Search Console. Find ten queries sitting on page two or three, pick two that share an intent, and build the better version of that answer. If you would rather have someone map the whole set, that is what SEO consultant services look like in practice. Generally, a query of three or more words with a modest monthly search volume. Ahrefs defines them as "search queries that get a small number of searches per month" that are "longer and more specific than their 'head' or short-tail counterparts." The defining feature is specificity rather than word count. Emergency plumber Carlton is long tail, and plumber is not. Individually, yes, and that is exactly the point. In Ahrefs' index, 94.74% of keywords get 10 monthly searches or fewer, and only 0.0008% get more than 100,000. The advantage of the tail is that it is enormous when you add it up, less competitive, and full of people who already know what they want. Three places, all free. Google's autocomplete and People also ask boxes, the related searches at the bottom of a results page, and, most valuable for an existing site, the Queries report in Google Search Console filtered to positions 8 to 30. Those queries are ones Google already considers you relevant for. No, and this is the most common mistake. Writing one thin page per phrase creates dozens of near-duplicate pages competing with each other. Group phrases that share the same intent into one strong page, and only build a new page when the intent is genuinely different. More than ever, because AI answers are built from specific, well-defined passages. A page that answers one narrow question completely and clearly is far more quotable than a broad page that skims forty topics. The tail is also where conversational queries live, which are the longer, phrased-as-a-question searches people type into AI tools. Expect impression growth before clicks. New pages often start appearing in impressions for their target query within a few weeks, then earn clicks as they settle. Ahrefs' broader data shows only 1.74% of newly published pages reach the top 10 within a year for at least one keyword, so treat this as a compounding programme rather than a monthly channel.
What Long Tail Keywords Are and Why They Win
A clear definition you can use
How they differ from head terms
Why the Tail Is Where Most Searches Live
What keyword volume data actually shows
Why low volume still means real buyers
How to Find Long Tail Keywords for Your Business
Start with autocomplete and related searches
Mine the queries you already rank for in Search Console
Competitor pages and keyword tools
Judging a Long Tail Keyword Before You Write
Intent and commercial value
Competition and the quality of what already ranks
Cannibalisation against pages you already have
Writing a Page That Owns a Long Tail Query
Match the page type to the intent
Answer the query in the first paragraph
Structure for featured snippets and AI answers
Get a free consultation with us!

Turning Many Long Tail Keywords Into Fewer Stronger Pages
Cluster by topic instead of one page per phrase
When a new page is genuinely warranted
Internal Linking So Long Tail Pages Get Found
Link from hubs to spokes with descriptive anchors
Surface the tail from your service and category pages
Measuring Long Tail Performance
Track query groups, not single keywords
Watch impressions before clicks
Long Tail Keywords in an AI Search World
How answer engines handle specific queries
Writing so your page can be quoted
Common Long Tail Mistakes to Avoid
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a long tail keyword?
Aren't long tail keywords too low in volume to be worth it?
How do I find long tail keywords for free?
Should I write a separate page for every long tail keyword?
Do long tail keywords still matter with AI search?
How long until long tail pages bring traffic?




Latest Blog

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER
