Are you doing SEO or Ads?
Get a free consultation with us
Stop wasting money on ads that are not working.
- Get advertising that is intentional and measured properly.
- Reach your ideal target audience.
- Maximise ad spend efficiency.

Thirteen years of doing this has taught me that most business blogs do not fail because the writing is bad. They fail because the topics were chosen from inside the business instead of from the position the buyer is actually standing in. The version I would give you across a table: the one rule that decides whether a topic is worth writing, 50 topics grouped by how close the reader is to buying, the tests I run before committing an afternoon to a topic, and a publishing rhythm that survives a month where everything goes wrong. The pattern is so consistent that I can usually describe a business's blog before I open it. Eight posts, written over about four months, on subjects the owner finds interesting. Then a gap of eight months, then one post announcing a new staff member. Nobody abandoned it on purpose. The blog stopped because writing felt like unpaid work with no visible return, and that feeling was correct, because the topics had no return in them. Traffic and enquiries are produced by different topics. A post that answers a question your buyer has before they buy attracts people who are deciding. A post that describes your industry to your industry attracts other people in your industry, and they will read it, share it, and never buy anything. This is why I ask a blunt question about every topic: if this post worked, who would be reading it at nine at night, and what would they be about to do? If the honest answer is a competitor, the topic is not a lead generator, whatever its numbers look like. For a small Australian business, a working blog is not a large one. It is a thin layer of pages that answer the questions your sales calls keep hearing, sitting alongside service pages that can take an enquiry. Ten useful posts that each answer one real question will beat fifty posts that each restate something generic. The other half of the job is the part owners skip. An enquiry needs somewhere to land. A blog post that answers a question and then links to nothing useful is a dead end, and dead ends do not show up in a report as failures, they just quietly do nothing. Nine out of ten topic lists I am handed were built from a keyword tool. They have the right words in them and no questions. A keyword tells you a phrase exists. It does not tell you what the person wanted when they typed it. Start instead from the things people say to you before they buy. The hesitation on the phone, the question in the email, the thing every second customer gets wrong, the comparison they are trying to make between you and the other option. Those are your first twenty topics and they are already written in your inbox. Once you have the question, the format is not a choice, it falls out of the question. A question about price wants a straightforward answer and the factors that move the number. A question about which of two options is better wants a comparison. A question about how to do something wants steps. A question about whether something is a problem wants a diagnosis with clear signs. Get the format wrong and the content still reads well while failing completely. A two thousand word history of your industry does not satisfy someone who typed how much does this cost. These are written in plain language on purpose. Swap the generic description for whatever you actually sell and the topic still works. The grouping matters more than the wording, because a reader at the start of their decision needs a different answer from a reader who is ready to book. These attract people who have noticed a problem and are working out what kind of problem it is. These attract people who know what they need and are deciding who should do it. These attract people who have chosen and are checking that they have chosen well. These attract past customers, and past customers are the cheapest traffic you will ever get. Two of the four tests below take ten minutes. Run them before you write anything, because the expensive mistake is not a bad post, it is a well written post on a topic that was never going to work. Type the question into Google and watch the autocomplete list. It is showing you what other people typed after the same opening words. Then scroll to the bottom of the results and read the related searches. Then open the People also ask box and click two of the questions, which generates more of them. The strongest signal is your own site. If you have Search Console, open the Queries report and filter to positions eight to thirty. Every query sitting there is one Google already considers you relevant for, with real people searching it, and you are not yet earning the click. That list is your topic calendar, and it is free. Ask what the reader does next. If the honest answer is that they read it, nod and leave, the topic is a traffic topic and belongs at the bottom of your list. If the answer involves them wanting the thing you sell, the topic has commercial relevance. There is a second half to this test. Could a reasonable person read the post and still not know whether you do the work being discussed? If so, the post needs a clear link to the service page that says you do. Before you write, look at what currently ranks. If the first page is all national publishers and government sites, pick a narrower question. If it is three local competitors with thin pages, that is an opportunity. Then search your own site. I have seen more damage done by a new post than by a missing one. If you already have a service page, a category page or an older post targeting the same query, a new post competes with it and both drop. Update, expand or merge instead. If you want the longer version of how to run that check, I have written about how to do keyword research without paying for a subscription. Are you doing SEO or Ads? Stop wasting money on ads that are not working. This is the part where most advice you will read is either vague or invented. There is real survey data on it, so use that instead of a number someone liked the sound of. Blogging is not dying, despite what you may have heard. HubSpot's 2025 State of Blogging Report states: "Blogging is still very much alive: 65% of marketers work at companies that maintain blogs, 93% of them rate it as important or very important to their marketing strategy, and 50% saw higher ROI from blogging in 2024 versus the prior year." The same report puts actual output in perspective: "22% of businesses that maintain blogs publish content on a daily basis." and "37% publish two to three times per week." Read those last two together and the sensible position appears. Roughly a third of blogging businesses publish two or three times a week and a fifth publish daily, which means the majority are not doing either. For a business with no dedicated content person, one genuinely useful post a week is a sustainable target and a realistic one. Orbit Media has surveyed bloggers every year for more than a decade, and the 2026 figures are worth knowing before you set your own standard. Orbit Media's 2026 Blogging Statistics reports the average blog post at "1,312 words", and its own summary of where that sits is worth quoting as written: "The average blog post, down from a peak of 1,427 in 2023". The average writing time is "3 hours, 20 minutes", and the same survey describes it as "The average time to write one, down from a peak of 4:10 in 2022". The number that should actually change your behaviour is about effort rather than length. The same report states: "Our own correlation charts from past surveys kept showing that spending 6+ hours writing 2,000-word posts roughly doubled the odds of strong results." Notice what that says. It is not about hitting a word count, it is about how much work went into the thing. So the practical answer is that length follows the question. A pricing question might be done properly in 900 words. A comparison might need 2,500. What you cannot do is produce something in forty minutes and expect it to outperform a competitor who spent six hours. Writing a post in one sitting is how most people quit. Do it in three passes instead. Pass one is research and a rough structure, thirty to forty minutes, no sentences worth keeping. Pass two is the draft, written badly and quickly, with no editing at all as you go. Pass three is the edit, which is where the quality actually comes from and where the time should go. Batching matters because it removes the daily decision. If you have to decide to write every day, you will not. If Wednesday morning is research and Thursday morning is drafting, you stop negotiating with yourself. One post a week needs about four hours across the week, not a full day. Monday, thirty minutes: confirm the topic and check demand. Tuesday, ninety minutes: draft without stopping. Wednesday, sixty minutes: edit for meaning, then edit for the actual question being answered. Thursday, thirty minutes: add the internal links and the images, and publish. If that is still too much, publish fortnightly and do it properly. Four strong posts a quarter beat twelve rushed ones, and a rushed post does lasting damage because it sets the standard for the next one. Put the answer in the first two sentences. Someone who typed a question into a search engine wants the answer before the context, and if they have to scroll to find it they will go back and click the next result. This also happens to be how Google's featured snippets and AI answers read a page, which is a side effect rather than the reason to do it. After the answer, explain the variables. What changes the answer, when the answer is different, what to check. That structure satisfies the reader who wanted a quick decision and the reader who wanted to understand, which is the same person at two different moments. Every post should link to something that continues the journey. Not in a way that feels like a sales interruption, but a link that is genuinely the next useful thing. Someone who has just read a pricing post should be able to reach the page that talks about getting a quote. Use plain, descriptive anchor text so the link reads as part of the sentence. Then make sure the destination exists and answers the question, because a link to a page that does not deliver is worse than no link. If you would rather not write the posts yourself, that is what my blog writing services are for, and it sits inside a wider approach to content marketing services if you want the whole system rather than the posts. At thirty days, the only metric worth looking at is whether the post is being indexed and starting to earn impressions for its target query. Clicks at this point mean almost nothing and you should not make decisions on them. At ninety days, look at impressions and position for the query group, plus any enquiries with the post in the path. This is where you learn whether you picked the right topic. At one hundred and eighty days, compare the posts against each other on enquiries rather than sessions, and retire or rewrite the ones that got impressions and no engagement. One number to keep in your head while you do this. The same Ahrefs study states: "Only 1.74% of newly published pages reach the top 10 search results within one year for at least one keyword. (Ahrefs)" That is not a reason to stop. It is a reason to judge the programme at the half year mark rather than the second week. Do not delete it. A post with impressions and no clicks usually has a title or a meta description problem, and that is a twenty minute fix. A post with no impressions at all usually targeted a query nobody searches, or is competing with a page you already have. The third case is the interesting one: a post that ranks, gets read, and produces nothing. That is almost always a structural problem rather than a content problem. The post answers the question and points nowhere. Add the internal link to the page that can take an enquiry and give it another ninety days. The most common mistake I see is attention paid to the wrong reader. A detailed piece explaining an industry change to other people in the industry will be respected by other people in the industry. It will not produce a customer, because no buyer has ever searched for it. There is a version of this that is more subtle. Writing to impress a smart reader rather than to help a worried one. Your buyer is not evaluating your expertise, they are trying to decide whether to spend money and whether they are about to be taken advantage of. Write for that person. Nobody searches for your new office, your anniversary, or the conference you attended. These posts exist to make the business feel active, and they perform exactly as well as they deserve to. If you want to share news, a newsletter or social post does that job without adding a page to your site that will never receive traffic. There is one exception, and it is narrow. If your news contains something genuinely useful to a buyer, such as a new service, a change to your service area, or a change in pricing structure, it can carry a post. The test is whether the reader learns something that changes what they do. If not, it belongs somewhere else. Pick three topics from the list above. For each one, check demand for ten minutes using autocomplete, related searches and your own Search Console queries report. Then keep the one with the clearest intent and the most obvious connection to something you sell. Write that one post. Answer the question in the opening sentences, explain the variables after it, and link to the service page that continues the reader's journey. Publish it, add it to a simple calendar note for a ninety day review, and then do the next one. The reason to start this way is that the topic list is the part that decides whether any of it works. If you would rather have someone go through it with you, that is what SEO consultant services look like in practice, and there is a library of more marketing guides on the blog if you want to work through the rest of it yourself first. There is no fixed number, and anyone quoting one is guessing. What the data does show is that effort per post correlates with results, and Orbit Media's surveys found that spending 6+ hours writing a 2,000-word post roughly doubled the odds of strong results. In practice, most small businesses start seeing enquiries somewhere between 10 and 25 well-targeted posts, but that depends on how competitive your topics are and whether the posts link to pages that can actually take an enquiry. Write the length the question deserves. Orbit Media's latest survey puts the average blog post at 1,312 words, down from a peak of 1,427 in 2023, and the average writing time at 3 hours 20 minutes. Those are averages, not targets. A pricing question might need 900 words and a comparison guide might need 2,500. Consistency beats volume. In HubSpot's survey of 500+ marketers, 37% of blog-producing businesses published two to three times a week and another 30% published weekly. For a business with no dedicated content person, one genuinely useful post a week is a sustainable goal, and far better than four rushed posts that all say the same thing. You can, but speed is not the advantage. Orbit Media's 2026 data found that 92% of marketers now use AI, and that AI users and non-AI users reported the same odds of strong results. Use it for editing and outlining, and keep your own experience in the substance, because the experience is the part a competitor cannot copy. New pages rarely rank quickly. Ahrefs' data shows only 1.74% of newly published pages reach the top 10 within a year for at least one keyword. Your realistic early wins come from specific, low-competition questions, internal links from pages you already have that rank, and consistent publishing rather than one big post. No, and it will hurt you, because two of your own pages competing for the same query is cannibalisation. Blog posts should target the informational version of the question, such as how much a new website costs in Australia, and then link to the commercial page that answers it. The service page is the destination, not the topic.
Why Most Business Blogs Do Not Bring In Leads
The difference between traffic and enquiries
What good looks like for an Australian small business
The One Rule Behind Every Blog Topic Worth Writing
Start from the question, not the keyword
How search intent decides the format you should use
50 Blog Topics for Business, Grouped by Buyer Stage
Awareness topics: the questions your market asks early
Consideration topics: comparisons and how-to guides
Decision topics: pricing, process and proof
Retention and referral topics most owners ignore
How to Tell a Topic Will Actually Bring Leads
Demand signals you can check for free in ten minutes
The commercial relevance test
Difficulty and cannibalisation check against pages you already have
Get a free consultation with us

How Often to Publish and How Long a Post Should Be
What the publishing frequency data actually shows
What the effort and length data actually shows
Turning a Topic List Into a Publishing Calendar
Batching research, drafting and editing so it fits one day a week
A realistic one-post-per-week schedule for a small team
The Post Structure That Ranks and Converts
Answer first, then explain
Internal links that move readers toward your service pages
How to Measure Whether Blogging Is Working
Metrics that mean something at 30, 90 and 180 days
What to do when a post underperforms
Common Blog Topic Mistakes Australian Businesses Make
Writing for peers instead of buyers
Publishing company news nobody searches for
Where to Start This Week
Frequently Asked Questions
How many blog posts do I need before I see leads?
Should I write short posts or long ones?
How often should an Australian small business publish?
Do I need to use AI to keep up?
Will my blog rank if nobody links to it?
Can I just repurpose my service pages into blog posts?




Latest Blog

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER

WINNER

FINALIST

FINALIST

WINNER

Xugar Holiday Offer